• 0800-011-2031

Legal Frameworks for International Data Transfers

The key to regulating data protection within the European Union lies in compliance with The General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR), a fundamental legal framework. GDPR mandates that organizations implement adequate safeguards before transferring personal information from within the EU to a country located outside it. Specific legal mechanisms or contractual arrangements can be used as safeguards.
Adequacy is a key mechanism used for legal data transfers. An adequacy decision is reached by the European Commission concerning whether a specific country offers sufficient levels of data protection similar to those in the EU. Data transfers to a country considered adequate are typically permitted without additional safeguards.
Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), also known as Model Clauses, are another commonly used legal mechanism for international data transfers. SCCs are standardized contractual clauses approved by the European Commission that organizations can incorporate into their agreements with data importers in countries outside the EU. These clauses provide certain data protection commitments and obligations for the parties involved.
Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) are internal codes of conduct adopted by multinational organizations to facilitate transfers of personal data within their group of companies. BCRs must be approved by the relevant data protection authorities and provide robust safeguards for the protection of personal data across different jurisdictions.
By using the mechanism of the EU-US Privacy Shield, it became simpler for American firms to send data across to Europe. The European Court of Justice invalidated the Privacy Shield in July 2020 due to concerns over U.S. surveillance practices. When companies depend solely on the Privacy Shield for transferring data, they must investigate other lawful alternatives.
In certain circumstances, organizations may rely on derogations under the GDPR to justify international data transfers without the need for specific legal mechanisms. These derogations include obtaining explicit consent from the data subjects, the necessity of the transfer for the performance of a contract, or the establishment, exercise, or defense of legal claims.
Other than under the GDPR regulations, international data transfers might encounter extra necessities or limits enforced by specific EU member states own set of rules for protecting their citizens’ personal information. Compliance with both GDPR and specific data protection laws of each country involved in the transfer must be ensured by organizations.
International agreements and treaties may also control how data is moved across borders, along with the EU’s data protection framework. Council of Europe’s Convention 108 provides principles and guidelines regarding automatic processing that protects individuals’ privacy. For example. For data flows across borders.
Finance and healthcare are examples of industries with sector-specific regulations that impose added requirements for international data transfers. Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) sets standards for securely handling credit card data, to give an instance. Transferring data across borders requires adherence to specific requirements.
Data protection laws of the countries where organizations operate or transfer data must also be considered. These laws could require additional obligations or restrictions on international data transfers. Local data protection authorities may require data localization or prior authorization.

Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs)

Widely acknowledged legal mechanisms for moving personal data from Europe’s economic hub (EEA) to other countries are standard contractual clauses, also known as model clauses or EU model clauses. This mechanism guarantees that personal data is protected in compliance with
The European Commission has pre-approved contractual terms called SCCs, which organizations can use in their agreements to ensure adequate data protection.
The primary objective of SCCs is to provide a framework of contractual obligations and safeguards that enable organizations to transfer personal data to countries that do not have an adequacy decision from the European Commission. SCCs offer a standardized set of provisions that uphold fundamental data protection principles and ensure a level of protection equivalent to that provided within the EEA.
To establish respective duties regarding privacy protection, SCCs contain contract provisions that delineate what is required from both parties involved: The entity sending out personal details – or ‘the data exporter’, as well as its receiver- or ‘data importer’. Several aspects are covered by these provisions such as why data is being shared between parties involved in this undertaking along with what are their respective roles & responsibilities. Provisions related to security measures implemented for protecting sensitive information from getting compromised are also included.

Types of SCCs

The European Commission has issued different sets of SCCs to cater to specific data transfer scenarios. These include:
  • Controller-to-Controller SCCs: Used when two controllers in different jurisdictions transfer personal data.
  • Controller-to-Processor SCCs: Applicable when a controller transfers personal data to a processor in a non-EEA country.
  • Processor-to-Processor SCCs: Relevant when a processor in the EEA engages another processor in a non-EEA country.
  • Processor-to-Controller SCCs: Employed when a processor in a non-EEA country transfers personal data to a controller in the EEA.

Other Mechanisms for Data Transfers:

A direct line of reporting from the DPO to either senior management or the highest level of authority within an organization is necessary. This reporting structure strengthens the autonomy of the DPO. This measure ensures that there are no conflicts of interest due to reporting to a department or individual with competing objectives.

Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs):
BCRs are internal codes of conduct implemented by multinational organizations to ensure consistent data protection practices across their entities. BCRs require approval from the competent data protection authorities and offer an alternative to SCCs for intra-group data transfers.
The European Commission can issue adequacy decisions, determining that a non-EEA country or a specific sector within that country provides an adequate level of data protection. When an adequacy decision is in place, organizations can transfer personal data to that country without the need for additional safeguards.
In certain circumstances, organizations may rely on derogations or exceptions to justify data transfers without using SCCs or other mechanisms. Derogations include situations where the data subject provides explicit consent, the transfer is necessary for the performance of a contract, or the transfer is in the public interest.
Codes of conduct and certification mechanisms, established under the GDPR, can provide additional safeguards and assurances for international data transfers. These voluntary schemes allow organizations to demonstrate their commitment to data protection compliance and provide enhanced protection for transferred data.

Challenges and Considerations

  • Assessing Data Importer’s Jurisdiction: It is essential to conduct a thorough assessment of the data importer’s jurisdiction to understand any local laws or regulations that may impact data protection and security.

  • Supplementary Measures: In some cases, SCCs alone may not provide adequate protection, particularly when the destination country’s laws conflict with GDPR requirements. Organizations may need to implement additional safeguards, such as encryption, pseudonymization, or specific technical and organizational measures.

  • Monitoring and Compliance: Organizations must establish robust monitoring and compliance mechanisms to ensure ongoing adherence to the contractual obligations and safeguards outlined in SCCs or other mechanisms.

  • Evolving Legal Landscape: Data protection regulations and legal requirements related to international data transfers are subject to change. Organizations must stay informed about updates and adapt their practices accordingly.

Impact of Brexit on SCCs

UK SCCs were introduced by the UK after Brexit as a variation of traditional SCCs. The UK can use these to transfer data to non-EEA nations, which mirror the EU SCCs. To transfer data between the UK and EEA, you should consider both EU SCCs as well as UK SCC. In compliance with the corresponding legal frameworks.
When using SCCs or other mechanisms, organizations may need to conduct Data Transfer Impact Assessments (DTIAs) to identify and evaluate the risks associated with specific data transfers. DTIAs enable organizations to implement appropriate safeguards and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.
The legal frameworks for international data transfers, including SCCs and other mechanisms, play a crucial role in facilitating secure and lawful data flows across borders. Organizations must carefully assess their data transfer requirements, select the appropriate mechanism, and ensure compliance with the relevant legal requirements to protect individual’s personal data and maintain trust in the global digital ecosystem.

Legal Frameworks for International Data Transfers

Assessing adequacy refers to evaluating whether the level of data protection in the recipient country is equivalent to that provided within the originating country or region. Adequate protection ensures that individuals’ personal data remains secure and their privacy rights are respected during international transfers.
Adequacy decisions play a vital role in assessing data protection levels in third countries. Adequacy decisions are official rulings issued by competent authorities or bodies, such as the European Commission, stating that a particular country, or a specific sector within that country, provides an adequate level of data protection. Adequacy decisions serve as a legal basis for transferring personal data without the need for additional safeguards.
The power to issue adequacy decisions falls under GDPR and is held by the European Commission. The assessment process for the recipient country involves evaluating its legal framework, and government surveillance practices alongside individual rights and remedies that are accessible to data subjects. If deemed adequate by the European Commission, personal data can be transferred freely without requiring further measures.

Other Mechanisms for Ensuring Lawful Data Transfers:

As mentioned earlier, Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) are contractual clauses that are frequently used to provide obligations and safeguards for data transfers. Employing SCCs becomes necessary when the level of data protection in the receiving nation isn’t considered adequate.
BCRs are internal codes of conduct implemented by multinational organizations to govern transfers of personal data between entities within their corporate group. BCRs must be approved by relevant data protection authorities and provide safeguards for data transfers within the organization.
In certain situations, organizations may rely on derogations or exceptions to justify data transfers without using SCCs or BCRs. Derogations include obtaining explicit consent from data subjects, the necessity of the transfer for the performance of a contract, or transfers that are in the public interest.
Codes of conduct and certification mechanisms, established under the GDPR, offer additional safeguards for data transfers. Organizations that adhere to approved codes of conduct or hold relevant certifications can demonstrate their commitment to data protection and ensure lawful transfers.

Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs)

Assessing adequacy and ensuring lawful data transfers often involve conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs). DPIAs help organizations identify and assess the potential risks associated with data transfers, evaluate the safeguards in place, and implement necessary measures to protect individuals’ rights and interests.
Supplementary Measures:
In some cases, even when using mechanisms like SCCs or BCRs, organizations may need to implement supplementary measures to ensure the adequate protection of personal data. Supplementary measures can include encryption, pseudonymization, data minimization, or specific technical and organizational measures to enhance security and protect data subjects’ rights.

Ongoing Monitoring and Compliance:
Assessing adequacy and ensuring lawful data transfers is an ongoing process. Organizations must continually monitor changes in data protection regulations, reassess the adequacy of data transfers, and update their safeguards and mechanisms as needed. Compliance with data protection laws, including maintaining documentation and records of transfers, is crucial to demonstrate accountability and transparency.

All © Copyright reserved By The DPOA | Designed by muradraza